Our jaws just hit the floor
Perfektion. Or would that be perfezione? Either way, yes please, we want them. Both of them.
Bonus points for anyone who can tell us which car has the lower drag coefficient, the slippery German coupé or the taller and [ostensibly] boxier Italian saloon.
(Thanks blufaction for the photograph.)
Motoring Con Brio 
Kamm tail on the Guila gets it? Nice both regardless!
kuroneko said this on August 31, 2010 at 7:25 am
Nice indeed!
My guess would be the Alfa, seeing that it had a very low drag coefficient value for it’s time.
R-sport said this on August 31, 2010 at 7:26 am
the alfa it is! it’s been said that the giulia super has a lower drag coefficient than a 911’s from the same period.
motoring con brio said this on August 31, 2010 at 12:10 pm
Both look like fun, although the alfa needs a new headlight!
The 911 was always slippery, so I’d go with that one. The alfas at the recent Silverstone classic were wonderful but the early 2.0 litre 911 looked gorgeous….maybe I should post a few of the images?
snowgood said this on August 31, 2010 at 9:07 am
i wonder if one of the headlights was removed for additiional cooling of the engine compartment.
and sure, please link to your silverstone images.
motoring con brio said this on August 31, 2010 at 12:12 pm
I had your blog in mind when I posted this. Thought this would be your cup of tea.
blufaction said this on August 31, 2010 at 1:40 pm
I recall the Alfa as having a .34 coefficient…I used to own a 67 Giulia Super…I have a 69 911S and I think it is around .36
jimf said this on September 1, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Great site and photography! Please keep me updated.
Gregor said this on September 28, 2010 at 8:49 am